UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women (1993)

The UN General Assembly adopted resolution 48/104 on 20 December 1993. Article 1 includes gender-based acts likely to cause physical, sexual or psychological harm, as well as threats, coercion and arbitrary deprivation of liberty. Violence occurring within a household comes within a public human-rights framework.

What authorities owe when a private person acts

Article 2 includes violence within families, in the community and perpetrated or condoned by the state. Its examples range from marital rape to workplace sexual harassment. Article 4 calls for due diligence to prevent, investigate and punish acts in accordance with national law, including those committed by private persons. The question reaches how public institutions respond to risk and reports of harm.

The declaration also addresses professional training, support services and collection of information. Counts of cases that reached a court can overlook people unable to seek help or unwilling to trust the system. Service access and institutional responses help put those figures in context.

What public bodies did when help was sought

Article 4 pairs two requirements worth reading together. States should neither invoke custom, tradition or religion to escape their obligations nor leave violence by private actors outside the scope of due diligence. The first addresses who gets to decide what a family or community will tolerate. The second puts the actions of public institutions in view. When someone reports threats repeatedly, asking only whether an offender was eventually punished can miss earlier opportunities to provide protection.

Article 4 also addresses specialised assistance and training for public officials. The provisions come into focus if read in the order that a survivor might need them: finding reliable information, securing a safe place to go and getting support that continues after the immediate crisis. The preamble identifies groups particularly vulnerable to violence. Changes in reporting should be read alongside the practical availability of support, including barriers posed by language, income and distance.

Read CEDAW General Recommendation No. 35 alongside the declaration. The later document interprets treaty obligations, making it possible to compare how discrimination and state responsibility are articulated in the two instruments.

Original text