FemResThe Living Review

Gender Norms · Research

“Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”

“Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”: A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain

A review of 77 studies connects chronic pain care to norms of endurance, expression and medical prestige, including the costs of masculine self-reliance for men.

Read the paper
Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Research notes

Samulowitz and colleagues’ review examines gender bias in chronic pain through the patient-provider encounter. Recognition depends partly on who resembles the supposedly normal patient. “Brave” and “emotional” are labels under examination, not the authors’ descriptions of two natural kinds.

Endurance can also be a trap

The authors integrate 77 eligible articles, organizing their findings through hegemonic masculinity and andronormativity. Endurance, independence and limited help-seeking receive masculine prestige, yet these expectations can also delay men’s consultations and constrain expressions of vulnerability.

Women face another double bind: reporting distress can appear excessive, while enduring it does not necessarily secure recognition of its seriousness. The problem cannot be solved simply by finding the correct intensity of expression. Patients and professionals interpret bodies through existing expectations. Treating male experience as an unmarked medical norm also influences research priorities and the prestige of particular diagnoses.

Equitable care without reversed stereotypes

By connecting identity, lifestyle, coping and treatment decisions, the review shows why bias exceeds an individual clinician’s hostility. It can operate through professional common sense, disease classifications and institutional priorities. A corrective that simply calls women more sensitive and prescribes more intervention would reproduce the essentialism being questioned.

The included studies differ in methods, conditions and settings; they do not yield one discrimination rate applicable to every patient. Their predominantly binary classifications also invite questions about transgender and nonbinary experiences. The review identifies mechanisms to investigate rather than providing a diagnostic instrument for individual cases.

The Girl Who Cried Pain supplies an earlier discussion of clinical credibility. The Color of Pain introduces racial inequality in maternity care, challenging the idea that women patients form a homogeneous group.

Reader responses

Research discussion

Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes