FemResThe Living Review

Race and Gender · Research

Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception

Lugones connects playful travel between social worlds with loving perception, while refusing the demand to enter hostile worlds without protection.

Read the paper
Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Research notes

Does being serious or silent in one setting and playful in another make one of those selves false? María Lugones’s 1987 article approaches relationships among women through that experience. A world is not simply a country. It is an organization of life that constructs people, language and possibilities in particular ways. Someone can inhabit several worlds at once.

Seeing beyond an assigned identity

Her relationship with her mother exposes an education that calls women’s self-abnegation love. A daughter caught between repeating that life and abandoning it can fail to understand her mother as a person with different possibilities. Lugones connects this difficulty to relations between women of color and white women. Ignoring or stereotyping another woman does more than withhold kindness: it confines the ways she can be recognized.

World-travelling is neither pretending to possess another personality nor collecting foreign cultures. It questions whether the explanations taken for granted in one’s own setting can account for another person. Changing one’s location as a perceiver may make the other a responding subject while changing how one understands oneself in her eyes.

Playfulness without conquest

Lugones contrasts competition organized around winning, competence and fixed rules with openness to surprise and willingness not to know. A riverside episode of breaking stones to discover their colors makes the latter attitude concrete. Meaning need not be secured by a predetermined game, nor must participants preserve one authoritative image of themselves. This does not trivialize politics; it asks whether understanding must always aspire to mastery.

The conclusion also sets a boundary. Some worlds are organized through conquest and arrogance. People may enter them from necessity without being obliged to enter playfully. Crossing differences is not unconditional intimacy and cannot replace material or institutional change. Reducing the argument to a general request for empathy would erase its unequal conditions of survival.

Coloniality and Gender takes questions about classification into colonial history. Borderlands/La Frontera explores the linguistic and formal costs of crossing. This reading path does not ask for every boundary to disappear. It asks how people can remain more than someone else’s single account of who they are.

Reader responses

Research discussion

Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes