Sexual Politics · Screening
A Little-Told Tale of Sex and Sensuality
Shereen El Feki connects virginity certificates, marriage and Arabic erotic traditions to bodily autonomy and institutional change.
Screening notes
Intimate life is not outside politics. In this talk, Shereen El Feki brings interviews across the Arab region into conversation with marriage norms and historical texts. She examines the distance between how people live and what they can publicly acknowledge. Recorded in 2013 and published in 2014, the talk documents a period of discussion rather than supplying one current account of every country’s laws and practices.
Faiza, an unmarried mother, opens the talk with two virginity certificates. The contradiction concerns social recognition: documents and respectable identity regulate acceptability while pregnancy, parenting and material needs continue. Such certificates are not reliable medical evidence of sexual history. The question is why women must navigate these classifications to secure space for themselves and their children.
Marriage as a social entrance
El Feki describes marriage as a gate to recognized adulthood, sex and reproduction. Its costs and economic conditions are therefore not external to sexuality. Where one relationship form controls access to housing, respect and services, family, state and resources govern desire together. Unequal reputational risks make silence a poor measure of women’s needs.
Historical Arabic erotic writing, including The Encyclopedia of Pleasure, challenges the idea that present prohibitions exhaust the culture’s possibilities. Yet frank sexual writing and gender hierarchy can coexist. A historical tradition of discussing pleasure does not establish universal past equality or automatically secure bodily autonomy today.
Change has more than one script
Education, health initiatives and support for unmarried mothers locate change in negotiated conditions rather than one imported sexual revolution. A further question follows: who has the safety and resources to negotiate slowly, and whose life cannot wait? Attention to context must not demand indefinite patience from those facing restrictions.
The argument rests on cases and historical contrasts, not a probability survey of all Arab sexual lives. Abu-Lughod’s critique of rescue rhetoric questions externally imposed liberation models. The talk on sex and pleasure on one’s own terms offers a different regional comparison. These paths connect choice, language and institutions without reducing a region to one sexual culture.
Explore another medium
- Papers
Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving?
Lila Abu-Lughod
Lila Abu-Lughod examines rescue rhetoric around Afghanistan, connecting cultural difference to political history and responsibilities for global injustice.
Religion and Gender - Articles
The Tragedy of Woman’s Emancipation
Emma Goldman
Emma Goldman examines paid work, domestic burdens and internalized respectability, while her naturalized claims about love and motherhood invite criticism.
Sexual Politics · Bodily Autonomy
Continue through the issues
Related theme · No. 09
Who is allowed to desire?
Beginning with The Right to Sex, we ask whose desire is treated as natural and whose requires moral permission. Power shapes desire, but desire gives nobody a claim to another person’s body. Attraction, love, solitude and care have no single answer. Across sexual hierarchies, erotic writing, asexuality and situated experiences, we make room for exploration, uncertainty, refusal and a change of mind.
Sexual Politics · Bodily Autonomy
Related theme · No. 03
Who gets to define the body?
From discipline and ageing to the internalised gaze, this issue follows the forces that watch, name and reclaim the body.
Bodily Autonomy
Reader responses
After the screening
Share your response or add another moving-image thread worth following.
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...
Support Us
If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.



