FemResThe Living Review

Climate Justice

Explore curated feminist content about Climate Justice

027
27 items
06
Connection paths

FemRes guide

The climate crisis is a struggle over whose world can continue

Climate change is planetary, but neither its causes nor its losses are shared equally. Fossil wealth, colonial land seizure and high-consumption economies have concentrated benefits while heat, pollution, displacement and disaster fall hardest on people with the least authority over infrastructure and policy. Climate justice changes the question from how to reduce carbon in the abstract to who owes whom, which lives and places are protected, and who is expected to absorb an unlivable transition.

Gender matters through social relations, not because all women are naturally vulnerable or inherently ecological. Land ownership, income, race, caste, disability, migration status, exposure to violence and responsibility for water, food and unpaid care shape the capacity to prepare, leave, recover and speak in public decisions. Treating women only as victims erases political leadership; presenting them as instinctive guardians of nature turns unequal labor into virtue and leaves institutions unchanged.

A feminist climate analysis also begins from land. Mining, plantations, dams, conservation enclosures and carbon markets can continue colonial claims to territory even when described as development or protection. Indigenous women and land defenders show that environmental harm acts through bodies, water, kinship, governance and cultural continuity at once. Consultation after a project is designed cannot substitute for sovereignty, free consent and the power to refuse extraction.

Nor is every low-carbon solution automatically just. Renewable supply chains can create new sacrifice zones; adaptation can protect valuable property while abandoning poor neighborhoods; resilience can become a demand that communities survive without redistribution. A just transition must therefore be judged across labor, care, housing, disability access, public services, land return, finance and democratic control. The goal is not to add women to a green economy whose ownership remains intact, but to reorganize whose knowledge, needs and futures guide ecological change.

Four questions to carry through the archive

Who produced the risk and who benefited?

Trace emissions, extraction, land control and accumulated wealth rather than treating exposure as an unfortunate feature of geography.

How is vulnerability made?

Look for housing, care burdens, labor conditions, disability access, citizenship and political exclusion—not an innate weakness assigned to women.

Does the solution create another sacrifice zone?

Follow minerals, energy, waste, policing and displacement through the full life of a green technology or conservation plan.

Who can decide and refuse?

Representation is insufficient when affected communities cannot control land, funding, knowledge, timelines and whether a project proceeds.

Choose a way in

Move from intersectional climate policy to critiques of vulnerability and virtue, then follow land, extraction and the philosophical hierarchies beneath environmental domination.

Connection paths

Adjacent topics

Media composition

Read along this issue

27 · Climate Justice

Books

View all

Films

Videos

Articles

Papers