FemResThe Living Review
Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate

Arab Feminism · Books

Women and Gender in Islam

Historical Roots of a Modern Debate

AuthorLeila Ahmed

Leila Ahmed traces how gender, law, and religious authority changed across Islamic history, then shows how colonial rule turned the veil and the ‘woman question’ into political symbols.

Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Review and reading guide

First published in 1992 and reissued by Yale University Press in 2021 with a new foreword by Kecia Ali, Leila Ahmed’s Women and Gender in Islam asks how gender arrangements came to look timeless. Its historical arc runs from pre-Islamic Mesopotamia and the Mediterranean Middle East through the formation of Islamic discourses, Abbasid and medieval societies, and modern Egypt. The book’s key move is methodological: rather than treating “Islam” as one fixed answer about women, it follows the institutions, social changes, and arguments through which particular answers gained authority. The sweep is deliberately ambitious, but it is not a claim that every Muslim society followed one path.

The opening chapters challenge explanations that make women’s subordination appear natural or biologically inevitable. Ahmed proposes that the rise of urban societies and early states helped institutionalize gender hierarchy, drawing on archaeological and historical material to make the past itself part of feminist argument. This is a consequential but broad historical claim, not a universal law established for every society. Its value here is to unsettle the assumption that patriarchy has always had the same form—and to make readers ask what kinds of evidence allow historians to reconstruct women’s earlier lives when written records are uneven.

That question sharpens in the chapters on the rise of Islam and the formation of its founding discourses. Ahmed describes a tension between an ethical language in the Qur’an that addresses women as moral and spiritual subjects and marriage structures that establish hierarchy between the sexes. She does not resolve the tension by declaring the scripture inherently liberating and later history a betrayal, nor by treating patriarchy as the only possible meaning of Islam. Instead, she asks how ethical possibilities and legal-social arrangements coexist, and how institutions make some interpretations more powerful than others. This distinction is more demanding than either a defense of religion or a verdict against it: it keeps textual interpretation, law, and lived social relations in view at once.

The chapters on Abbasid and later medieval settings then make that institutional question historical and class-specific. Ahmed describes elite and bourgeois women’s increasing seclusion in Abbasid records, while also warning that the periods and places she can cover depend on the surviving scholarship and sources. In the medieval survey she focuses primarily on Egypt, Turkey, and Syria, especially Mamluk and Ottoman periods. That qualification matters: the book is a genealogy assembled from uneven archives, not a panoramic account of every Muslim woman’s life. Its method is strongest when it shows how legal discourse and social organization shape access to public and communal life; it should not be mistaken for a claim that women’s experience was uniform across class, region, or period.

Ahmed’s modern Egyptian chapters bring the argument into direct contact with colonial power. She traces how the “woman question” became a test of civilization and how the veil acquired meanings that exceeded clothing itself. Her reading of Qasim Amin’s 1899 The Liberation of Woman asks why proposals such as primary education and changes to polygamy and divorce law provoked such intense debate when related reforms had already circulated among Muslim intellectuals. The dispute was not simply about one author’s policy list; it concerned who could define progress and whose authority would govern women’s lives. British colonial officials could condemn veiling while ruling without political equality, while nationalist men could defend cultural independence and still regulate women. Ahmed’s account of colonial feminism therefore identifies a double movement: imperial power claims to rescue women, and that rescue claim can obscure the domination through which it speaks.

The veil discourse is especially useful for resisting present-day shortcuts. In the Harvard conversation about the book, Kecia Ali explains how the veil became a political language through which status, power, colonial rule, and resistance were made to signify one another. Ahmed’s conclusion similarly treats the veil’s late-twentieth-century re-emergence not as a timeless custom or a self-explanatory sign of either oppression or freedom, but in relation to the colonial discourse that had already loaded it with geopolitical meaning. That does not mean every woman who veils shares one motive. It means observers should ask who is interpreting the garment, in which political moment, and what the interpretation authorizes. The object of feminist analysis is not women’s clothing in isolation, but the struggle over who gets to make it stand for an entire society.

The 2021 edition’s foreword also helps locate the book historically rather than freeze it as the last word. Ali describes the work as part of the early-1990s wave that made women and gender harder to omit from Islamic history; she also notes how later archival and ethnographic studies developed subjects that Ahmed’s wide synthesis could only sketch. That is a productive limit. The book’s chronology ranges widely, but much of its modern political analysis centers on Egypt, and its 1992 horizon predates decades of scholarship by researchers working across more communities, languages, and methods. Its continuing value lies less in comprehensiveness than in the question it leaves readers with: how do colonial power, nationalist politics, religious interpretation, class, and gender jointly decide what counts as an authentic tradition?

Read this as a historical framework, then follow its questions into more situated work. Lila Abu-Lughod’s Do Muslim Women Need Saving? takes the rescue narrative into post-9/11 military and humanitarian politics, while Miriam Cooke’s Women Claim Islam examines how women writers create Islamic feminist interventions through literature. They extend different parts of Ahmed’s problem rather than simply confirm one thesis. Together, they help distinguish a history of ideas and institutions from the varied practices through which women interpret, contest, and inhabit religious traditions.

Reader responses

Readers' notes

Share your reading or add a thread worth following further.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes