FemResThe Living Review
Women and Wars

Feminist Security Studies · Books

Women and Wars

AuthorCarol Cohn

Carol Cohn’s feminist security studies collection traces gender through war economies, sexual violence, displacement, militaries, peace processes, and postwar life.

Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Review and reading guide

Edited by Carol Cohn, Women and Wars: Contested Histories, Uncertain Futures is a feminist security studies collection whose central question is not simply what women do in wartime, but how war depends on gendered arrangements of violence, labor, state power, and memory. Its chapters move from a conceptual framework and the political economy of war through sexual violence and health, forced displacement, activism, women in state militaries and non-state armed groups, and then peace processes, disarmament, demobilization, and postwar reconstruction. That sequence treats war not as an isolated event but as an institutional process extending before and after combat and deep into households and social life.

The volume’s most useful analytical discipline is refusing to treat “gender” as a synonym for “women.” Gender is an identity position, a relation through which power is organized, and a vocabulary that gives meaning to militarism, protection, sacrifice, and dependency. Simply adding women to military history can still leave the armed actor as the political subject while care, agriculture, factory work, flight, and rebuilding remain background. The chapters instead ask: whose labor sustains war without being counted as military history? When are women cast as people the state must protect, and when as expendable civilians, workers, or combatants? Who can name violence as political, and whose injuries are reduced to private tragedy?

This approach also refuses to fix women as either victims or natural peacemakers. Sexual violence has to be examined within specific military, economic, and social conditions rather than turned into a universal story about male nature or female powerlessness. Women’s participation in armies, nationalism, or armed movements is not automatically emancipatory either. Race, class, colonial histories, nationality, sexuality, and age reshape both vulnerability and agency. Restoring those differences prevents the visibility of a few women in institutions from being mistaken for equality within them.

The chapter sequence itself can serve as a reading method. Following one gendered relation through wartime economies, bodily harm, flight and resettlement, military organizations, peace negotiations, and demobilization lets readers test whether a power structure actually disappears when “the conflict” is declared over. A seat for women at a peace table, for example, does not tell us who performs postwar care, who can return to land, or who receives a livelihood and security. Conversely, reconstruction should not be relegated to work women supposedly perform by nature. The collection insists on holding institutional decisions and everyday life in view at once: recognize women’s actions without romanticizing them. In a seminar, readers might trace labor, embodiment, decision-making, and risk through one chapter, then compare how those relations change in another. That exercise brings the book’s broad scope into focus without mistaking breadth for a universal account.

These questions also prevent “postwar” from becoming a blank slate in our imagination. Property arrangements, care expectations, military budgets, and security institutions may continue under new names. Women’s participation should therefore be assessed by whether it changes those rules, not merely by counting who entered an army, a negotiating room, or public office. That distinction connects the book’s historical recovery to a more demanding account of transformation.

The collection’s breadth makes it a useful framework, but no anthology can provide equal historical depth for every conflict, and a volume published in 2012 cannot cover every later development in drone warfare, digital surveillance, or climate displacement. It works best as a set of questions rather than a complete inventory of women’s wartime experience. Its strongest lesson is that peace means more than the cessation of combat: it requires asking which militarized institutions, divisions of care, and political exclusions survive into the postwar order. The publisher’s description and contents show the volume’s movement from the conditions of war to postwar institutions.

Reader responses

Readers' notes

Share your reading or add a thread worth following further.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes