FemResThe Living Review

Decolonial Feminism · Research

Gender and Coloniality

Género y colonialidad: en busca de claves de lectura y de un vocabulario estratégico descolonial

Rita Segato examines colonial modernity’s reorganization of gender and political authority, while her historical model requires scrutiny rather than a romantic precolonial past.

Read the paper
Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Research notes

Colonialism does more than add gender ideas to an otherwise unchanged society. It reorganizes who represents a community and what counts as political. Rita Laura Segato’s 2011 “Género y colonialidad” offers a contested historical model of the transformation and intensification of existing patriarchal relations under colonial modernity.

A new boundary of public and private

Segato distinguishes communal gender duality from modern colonial binarism. The former is not presented as free of hierarchy. Her claim is that the latter installs the masculine as the universal human measure, reducing other positions to the particular, supplementary or private. Women’s communal spaces can consequently lose political standing.

An appeal to the state is therefore not sufficient by itself. State institutions may offer remedies against community violence while reinforcing men as its exclusive representatives. Community and state are not inherently good and bad alternatives. Women need room to contest different powers both within and beyond communal life.

Who formulates the research question?

The essay’s anthropology by demand responds to questions posed by people conventionally treated as objects of inquiry. They can shape what knowledge should explain, rather than merely contribute illustrative cases. This differs from assuming Indigenous women await external rescue, without requiring endorsement of every communal tradition.

The model’s breadth also creates its limitation. Distinct peoples, periods and households cannot be replaced by one historical trajectory. A lower-intensity patriarchy is not harmless, and women’s internal struggles cannot be dismissed as foreign contamination.

Lugones’s account of coloniality and gender allows comparison of different understandings of historical continuity and rupture. Cabnal’s body-territory politics returns those questions to women’s own organizing. Theory is useful here when it clarifies disagreements and their consequences, rather than resolving them in advance on behalf of those acting.

Reader responses

Research discussion

Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes