Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy
Arvin, Tuck, and Morrill challenge feminist theory to confront settler colonialism, Indigenous sovereignty, heteropatriarchy, land, and the colonial relations that can be reproduced through knowledge production.
📋 Abstract
🔑 Keywords
Maile Arvin, Eve Tuck, and Angie Morrill’s article is a major methodological text for Indigenous feminism and decolonial feminist thought. It argues that feminism cannot treat colonialism as background context while leaving settler occupation, land relations, kinship, gender order, and knowledge production intact.
Its central contribution is to place heteropatriarchy inside the structure of settler colonialism. For Indigenous communities, gender violence, family norms, academic research, and state recognition are not separate issues. They are entangled with land theft, the denial of sovereignty, and colonial governance. The authors ask feminism to stop absorbing Indigenous experience as another category of difference and instead reckon with Indigenous political relations and refusals.
For FemRes, this article belongs with Indigenous sovereignty, queer Indigenous feminism, and decolonial feminist method. It makes clear that decolonization is not an add-on to feminism. It requires feminism to examine its own location, benefits, and limits as a knowledge project.
Paper Info
Related Papers
Aspiring to a politics of alliance: Response to Sylvia Walby's 'Beyond the politics of location: The power of argument in a global era'
Ann Phoenix
Feminist Theory
Being reasonable, telling stories
Rita Felski
Feminist Theory
Beyond Identity: Feminism, Identity and Identity Politics
Susan Hekman
Feminist Theory
This project is supported by FatefulDeck.com
FatefulDeck AI Tarot - Premium 10-language Tarot reading platform powered by AI.