Indigenous Feminism · Research
Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy
Arvin, Tuck, and Morrill challenge feminist theory to confront settler colonialism, Indigenous sovereignty, heteropatriarchy, land, and the colonial relations that can be reproduced through knowledge production.
Abstract
The article argues that decolonizing feminism must confront settler colonialism, heteropatriarchy, Indigenous sovereignty, and the ways feminist knowledge can reproduce colonial relations.
Research notes
Maile Arvin, Eve Tuck, and Angie Morrill’s article is a major methodological text for Indigenous feminism and decolonial feminist thought. It argues that feminism cannot treat colonialism as background context while leaving settler occupation, land relations, kinship, gender order, and knowledge production intact.
Its central contribution is to place heteropatriarchy inside the structure of settler colonialism. For Indigenous communities, gender violence, family norms, academic research, and state recognition are not separate issues. They are entangled with land theft, the denial of sovereignty, and colonial governance. The authors ask feminism to stop absorbing Indigenous experience as another category of difference and instead reckon with Indigenous political relations and refusals.
For FemRes, this article belongs with Indigenous sovereignty, queer Indigenous feminism, and decolonial feminist method. It makes clear that decolonization is not an add-on to feminism. It requires feminism to examine its own location, benefits, and limits as a knowledge project.
Reader responses
Research discussion
Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...
Support Us
If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.