FemResThe Living Review

Indigenous Feminism · Research

Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy

Arvin, Tuck, and Morrill challenge feminist theory to confront settler colonialism, Indigenous sovereignty, heteropatriarchy, land, and the colonial relations that can be reproduced through knowledge production.

00

Abstract

The article argues that decolonizing feminism must confront settler colonialism, heteropatriarchy, Indigenous sovereignty, and the ways feminist knowledge can reproduce colonial relations.

Keywordsdecolonizing feminismsettler colonialismheteropatriarchyIndigenous sovereigntyfeminist theory
Read the paper
01

Research notes

Maile Arvin, Eve Tuck, and Angie Morrill’s article is a major methodological text for Indigenous feminism and decolonial feminist thought. It argues that feminism cannot treat colonialism as background context while leaving settler occupation, land relations, kinship, gender order, and knowledge production intact.

Its central contribution is to place heteropatriarchy inside the structure of settler colonialism. For Indigenous communities, gender violence, family norms, academic research, and state recognition are not separate issues. They are entangled with land theft, the denial of sovereignty, and colonial governance. The authors ask feminism to stop absorbing Indigenous experience as another category of difference and instead reckon with Indigenous political relations and refusals.

For FemRes, this article belongs with Indigenous sovereignty, queer Indigenous feminism, and decolonial feminist method. It makes clear that decolonization is not an add-on to feminism. It requires feminism to examine its own location, benefits, and limits as a knowledge project.

Reader responses

Research discussion

Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes