FemResThe Living Review

Gender Discrimination · Research

The Girl Who Cried Pain

The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias Against Women in the Treatment of Pain

Hoffmann and Tarzian separate pain experience from clinical credibility, showing why psychological explanations must not become reasons to dismiss women’s suffering.

Read the paper
Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Research notes

Pain has to be communicated, but patients do not receive equal credibility when they communicate it. In this 2001 review, Diane E. Hoffmann and Anita J. Tarzian connect biomedical research, gender socialization and clinical authority. An explanation of symptoms is not the same thing as a judgment about whether someone deserves belief.

Psychological does not mean unreal

The article moves from biological and experimental findings to cognition, emotion and help-seeking. This structure resists two shortcuts: average laboratory differences cannot define every woman, and the involvement of emotion does not make pain less deserving of treatment.

Causal direction matters. Unrelieved pain can produce anxiety or depression. If clinicians interpret these consequences solely as causes, unsuccessful treatment becomes another reason to distrust the patient. Conversely, when psychological factors do contribute to pain, discounting rather than addressing them is also inadequate care. The argument does not require rejecting psychological treatment.

When character judgments become clinical judgments

The authors discuss earlier findings that women were more likely to receive sedatives and men pain medication. The mechanism is an unequal interpretation of expression: a supposedly stoical man’s complaint can signal exceptional severity, while a woman’s persistence can be read as emotional excess. Gendered expectations enter what appears to be a neutral assessment of symptoms.

This historical interdisciplinary review is not a new clinical trial or a measure of every hospital’s treatment gap. Its sharper question is whether medicine asks patients to report pain while penalizing some ways of reporting it. Changing that distribution of credibility requires scrutiny of diagnostic routines and institutional responsibility, beyond coaching patients to appear calmer.

Read the endometriosis resource for a specific context of delayed recognition, then “Brave Men” and “Emotional Women” for a later analysis of gender norms within patient-provider encounters.

Reader responses

Research discussion

Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes