Climate Justice · Research
Re-politicizing the Gender and Climate Change Debate
Re-politicizing the Gender and Climate Change Debate: The Potential of Feminist Political Ecology to Engage with Power in Action in Adaptation Policies and Projects in Nicaragua
Gonda uses climate adaptation in Nicaragua to show how feminist political ecology can return power, emotion, subjectivity, and politics to gender and climate policy.
Abstract
Gonda applies feminist political ecology to climate adaptation policies and projects in Nicaragua, arguing that adaptation must engage power, emotions, subjectivities, knowledge politics, and transformation.
Research notes
Noémi Gonda’s article addresses a practical problem in climate policy: gender-blind adaptation is no longer easy to defend, yet many projects still translate gender into technical indicators, training quotas, or lists of vulnerable groups. Using adaptation policies and projects in Nicaragua, she shows that including women in a project does not necessarily address the power relations that produce climate injustice.
The article uses feminist political ecology to analyze how power works in adaptation practice. Gonda focuses on emotions, subjectivities, local knowledge, and political choices, asking whether adaptation projects reproduce existing orders or open possibilities for more democratic and equitable ways of living together.
For FemRes, this piece forms a reading path with Arora-Jonsson and MacGregor: first identify simplified narratives of women’s vulnerability or virtue, then ask how research and policy can re-politicize climate justice. It is especially useful for readers interested in development projects, the Global South, local governance, and ecological transformation.
Reader responses
Research discussion
Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...
Support Us
If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.