FemResThe Living Review

Black Feminism · Commentary

Lynch Law in America

Standfirst

Ida B. Wells challenges the protection of white women as a justification for lynching and connects racial violence to evidence, procedure and public responsibility.

FemRes / January 1900
Share this resource
X ↗Facebook ↗

01

Article analysis

When protecting women becomes a reason to remove someone else’s rights, the definition of danger needs scrutiny. In “Lynch Law in America”, published in January 1900, Ida B. Wells refuses to describe lynching as an occasional eruption of uncontrolled anger. Wells places lynching within relationships between racial power, public opinion and institutional tolerance.

Protection without evidence

The essay challenges the claim that lynching consistently punishes sexual assault. An accusation becomes permission to kill without sworn testimony, trial, defense or appeal. Women’s safety is transformed from a matter requiring investigation into moral language that shields violence from examination. Wells makes the failure national and political, rather than merely a problem of unusually cruel individuals.

Her comparison with Americans’ condemnation of injustice abroad exposes another evasion. Public outrage at another country’s judicial scandal can coexist with acceptance of killing without trial at home. Patriotism then protects the nation’s self-image rather than those vulnerable to its violence. The essay’s investigative force lies in asking what was alleged, who acted and which institutions allowed the result.

Two struggles need not cancel each other

Exposing racist accusations of rape does not mean denying sexual violence. Nor should people experiencing actual assault be silenced to protect a community’s reputation. The stronger question concerns whose evidence is heard, who is presumed criminal and who receives no protection. The essay’s own language of civilization also deserves criticism rather than adoption as a hierarchy between peoples.

Crenshaw’s intersectional analysis shows how antiracist and gender politics can each leave particular women outside their frame. CEDAW’s recommendation on gender-based violence develops obligations of prevention, investigation and remedy. Read together, they prevent the language of protection from becoming an exemption from accountability for those who exercise power.

02

Continue following this issue

01
Further reading / July 26, 2017

Gender-Based Violence: CEDAW No. 35

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women

02
Further reading / June 9, 1994

Belém do Pará Convention

Organization of American States (OAS)

03
Further reading / August 3, 2015

Women’s Access to Justice: CEDAW Recommendation 33

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women

Reader responses

Letters from readers

Respond to this article or add a source that belongs in the discussion.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes