FemResThe Living Review

Feminist Political Ecology · Research

The Gender and Environment Debate: Lessons from India

Agarwal critiques essentialist ecofeminist claims through Indian cases, shifting attention to land, class, caste, labor, and control over resources.

00

Abstract

Agarwal challenges essentialist accounts of women and nature by grounding gender-environment relations in property, labor, class, caste, and institutional access.

Keywordsgender and environmentIndiaecofeminismproperty rightsfeminist political ecology
Read the paper
01

Research notes

Bina Agarwal’s article is a turning point between ecofeminism and feminist political ecology. It rejects romantic accounts that present women as naturally closer to nature or naturally better environmental caretakers, arguing that such claims obscure differences of class, caste, land rights, and labor among women.

The paper matters because it moves the gender-environment debate from cultural symbolism to material relations. Agarwal asks who owns land, who can access forests and water, who performs fuel and household labor, and who has voice in environmental policy. Environmental crisis becomes a question of gendered, classed, and caste-marked resource politics.

For FemRes, this text belongs with Ecofeminism, Caste and Gender, Development Studies, and Environmental Justice. It helps readers see that serious ecofeminism cannot stop at “women love nature”; it must ask how resources, institutions, and power are distributed.

Reader responses

Research discussion

Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.

Join the Discussion

Responses

Loading comments...

Support Us

If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.

Support FemRes