Workplace Equality · Research
Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?
Correll, Benard and Paik combine an experiment with an employer audit to distinguish judgments of competence, recommended pay and callback opportunities for mothers.
Research notes
Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty? turns a gap often attributed to mothers’ choices into a comparison of evaluation. When qualifications are equivalent and parental cues change, do hiring judgments change too? Correll, Benard and Paik combine a laboratory experiment with an audit of actual employers.
Evaluation before opportunity
Participants compare equally qualified, same-gender applicants whose materials signal different parental statuses. Outcomes include competence, commitment, hiring standards and recommended starting salary. Mothers receive penalties across several evaluations; fathers do not receive the same penalty and sometimes benefit.
Motherhood thereby operates as a status cue rather than neutral evidence of productivity. The same credentials can acquire a different meaning once evaluators expect mothers to be less committed. Formally identical rules do not remove assumptions about who resembles an ideal worker.
Callbacks are not job offers
The audit sends application materials to advertised positions and measures positive responses. This connects the laboratory mechanism to access to recruitment, but does not directly measure performance after hiring, promotion or paid wages. Likewise, a laboratory salary recommendation is not an observed national earnings gap. The two components answer different questions; together they help explain how judgments become opportunities.
The study does not attribute the whole motherhood wage penalty to discrimination or establish the same effect across every occupation, country and present-day employer. Its participant pool and specific vacancies constrain generalization. Its more precise contribution is that unequal evaluation can arise even when differences in qualifications are held constant.
Acker’s account of gendered organizations explains the supposedly care-free ideal worker. The Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention shifts attention toward institutional accommodation of care, beyond asking mothers to prove exceptional dedication.
Explore another medium
- Articles
Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention, No. 156
International Labour Organization
The ILO’s 1981 convention treats care as an employment-equality issue for women and men, linking services, training and dismissal protection rather than individual favors.
- Articles
Women @ Work 2025: A Global Outlook
Deloitte Global
Deloitte's survey of 7,500 women across 15 countries maps workplace inequality through health, unpaid care, safety, and retention rather than treating advancement as an individual problem.
Workplace Equality · Gender Pay Gap
Reader responses
Research discussion
Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...
Support Us
If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.