Women's Health · Screening
His and Hers … Health Care
Paula Johnson distinguishes including women in research from analyzing differences, connecting trial design, diagnosis and the work of care.
Screening notes
Including women in a study does not guarantee that it answers questions about their health. In “His and hers … health care”, Paula Johnson connects research design, analysis and care. Recorded in 2013 and published by TED in 2014, the talk belongs to that medical context. Its cases and figures are historical examples, not current diagnostic or treatment instructions.
Johnson begins with her grandmother’s severe depression and the long search for a diagnosis. Which symptoms are recognized affects whose suffering becomes intelligible and treatable. The family’s continuing care also makes a gap in medical knowledge a redistribution of domestic time and work, beyond an abstract shortage of research.
Inclusion and analysis are separate decisions
Discussing cardiovascular research, Johnson observes that studies can include women without analyzing outcomes by sex. Numbers and knowledge are different questions. Reporting one average human outcome may conceal differences in symptoms, effects and risks. Spending the research budget cannot establish that those questions have been answered.
Her lung-cancer examples show how attention to differences can generate new questions. She also distinguishes preliminary findings from evidence capable of changing clinical care. That distinction matters for viewers: one mechanism does not establish that every woman needs one uniform alternative treatment. Asking about differences supports investigation rather than assigning answers to bodies in advance.
Equality concerns the integrity of knowledge
Johnson frames women’s health as both an equality issue and a question of scientific quality. The argument need not mean all disease divides into two tidy categories. Research defaults determine which differences are never asked about. Further inquiry must distinguish biological mechanisms, gendered social conditions and variation within groups; income, race, age and transgender experience do not automatically become intelligible through a binary average.
The talk is an entry into medical knowledge production, not a symptom checklist. Patients can ask questions without bearing sole responsibility for repairing research. Martin’s “The Egg and the Sperm” examines gendered scientific narratives. Inferior develops a longer debate about women and science. Together they move beyond counting women toward examining how research asks, interprets and tests questions.
Explore another medium
- Papers
The Egg and the Sperm
Emily Martin
Emily Martin examines gendered stories in reproductive science and asks why replacing the passive egg with an aggressive heroine may preserve the metaphor.
Science Studies - Books
Inferior: How Science Got Women Wrong
Angela Saini
A ground-breaking investigation into how deep-seated gender bias has permeated the scientific community, leading to long-standing 'scientific' misconceptions about women's capabilities. Spanning biology, psychology, and anthropology, Angela Saini reveals the true nature of women supported by the latest research.
Continue through the issues
Reader responses
After the screening
Share your response or add another moving-image thread worth following.
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...
Support Us
If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.



