Indigenous Feminism · Research
Land as Pedagogy: Nishnaabeg Intelligence and Rebellious Transformation
Simpson rethinks education through Nishnaabeg knowledge, centering land, story, embodied practice, relational accountability, and Indigenous resurgence.
Abstract
Simpson develops land as pedagogy through Nishnaabeg intelligence, arguing that learning emerges from land, story, embodied practice, relational accountability, and resurgence.
Research notes
Leanne Betasamosake Simpson’s article is a central text for understanding land-based education and Indigenous resurgence. It does not treat education as the transfer of knowledge inside formal institutions. Instead, it begins from Nishnaabeg story, land relations, embodied practice, and community responsibility to show how learning happens through relations with land and kin.
The article matters because it moves land away from being a teaching resource or cultural symbol and restores it as a site of knowledge, ethics, and political relation. Simpson resists approaches that detach Indigenous knowledge from land and insert it into colonial educational frameworks, where it becomes something to be owned, classified, and consumed. Learning requires responsibility, practice, relation, and resurgence.
For FemRes, this article connects Indigenous feminism, ecofeminist concerns, and decolonial education. It helps readers understand that land in Indigenous feminism is not an abstract metaphor. It is the basis of kinship, knowledge production, anti-colonial action, and future-making.
Reader responses
Research discussion
Respond to this research or add another paper worth reading together.
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...
Support Us
If you find our content valuable, please consider supporting FemRes.